• Dutch
  • Frisian
  • Afrikaans
Show full table of contents
Phonological processes
quickinfo

Phonological processes (rules) mediate between underlying, basic phonological forms (constituted by strings of phonemes) on the one hand and surface, phonetic forms (constituted by strings of phones i.e. allophones of phonemes) on the other. In essence, such mediation implies that rules are optional. In theory then, obligatory rules do not exist. This section deals with the most important phonological processes of Afrikaans.

readmore

The overall goal of the Taalportaal project is the construction of a comprehensive and authoritative scientific grammar of Dutch, Frisian and Afrikaans. At the same time, the aim is not to operate strictly within a specific theoretical framework such as, for example, in the case of phonology, generative or optimality phonology. At the same time, the description of the phonology of Afrikaans (or any language for that matter) cannot be completely untheoretical and, in what follows, applicable reference is made to all available relevant literature on a specific topic, regardless of its theoretical heritage.

As an orientation with respect to all topics concerning the most important Afrikaans phonological processes, the following reference list should be consulted:

(Donaldson, B.C. 1993), (Le Roux, T.H.; Pienaar, P. de V. 1927), (Combrink, J.G.H.; De Stadler, L.G. 1987), (De Villiers, M.; Ponelis, F.A. 1992), (Wissing, D.P. 1982), (Wissing, D. 1991), (Wissing, D. 1990), (Wissing, D. 1990), (Wissing, D. 1992), (Wissing, D. 1994), (Wissing, D. 2005), (Coetzee, A. W., Patrice S. Beddor and Daan P. Wissing 2014), (Wissing, D. 2006), (Wissing, D. 2010), (Wissing, D. 2011), (Wissing, D. 2014), (Wissing, D. 1995), (Wissing, D. 2011), (Wissing, D.; Coetzee, A. 1996), (Wissing, D.; Du Plessis, H. 1992), (Wissing, D.; Van Dijkhorst, A. 2006), (Wissing, D.P. 1978), (Wissing, D.P. 1987)(Wissing, D.P. 1989)(Lubbe, J.; Zonneveld, W. 1996) (FD). (Ernestus, M.T.C. 2000)(Schuppler, B.; Ernestus, M.; Scharenborg, O.; Boves, L. 2011). (Zonneveld, W. 1978)(De Stadler, L.G. 1989)(Coetzee, A.E. 1977)(Coetzee, A.E. 1990)(Coetzee, A.E. 1992)(Coetzee, A.E. 1990)(Coetzee, A.E. 1991), (Wissing, D. 2017), (Carstens, W.A.M.; Bosman, N., reds. 2017)

[+] The nature of phonological processes

As a demonstration of the nature and functioning of a phonological process, consider the following:

The coda consonant /n/ of the first syllable (sin-) of the words sintaksis[səntɑksəs]syntax and sinchronies[səŋkronis]synchronic is realised differently, triggered by the place of articulation of the following consonant viz. alveolar in the first instance and velar in the second. In both cases, one can assume that these are two phonetic manifestations of the same basic phoneme viz. /n/. In order to express the different phonetic alternations or realisations found in examples like these, certain theoretical frameworks, notably forms of generative phonology, maintain that surface phonetic representations are derived by means of phonological rules from underlying representations (see figure below). As such, /n/ may be pronounced as [n], or, alternatively, as [ŋ] or [m] in derivations with in- in respectively intrap[əntrɑp]step in, inkɔm[əŋkɔm]come in and inpɑs[əmpɑs]fit in. The same applies to prefixes like on-, aan- and van-. It also occurs frequently across word boundaries in sentence context.

This type of alternation , called homorganic nasal assimilation, affects consonant realisations. Similarly, vowels can be produced in more than one way, as in the case of their reduction, or in instances of unrounding. The vowel /ɑ/ in kanoncanon frequently reduces to schwa in [kənɔn]; the vowel /y/ in nuus[nys]news is commonly unrounded, rendering [nis]. Other commonly observed processes that affect pronunciation are the raising, lowering and centralising of vowels, to be dealt with in other topics (see the index at the bottom of this page).

The following figure depicts the above-mentioned example of nasal assimilation.


Figure 1

[click image to enlarge]
  1. The red broken line indicates the division between underlying (abstract) and surface (directly observable) structures. Accordingly, phonological processes (here nasal assimilation) are also underlying, representing a largely unconscious form of knowlegde - in a number of theoretical frameworks these processes are expressed in terms of phonological rules which are posited as being found in the mind/brain of a person who speaks a particular language.
  2. The phoneme /n/ is here seen as the underlying representation of the three allophones viz. the surface forms [n], [ŋ] and [m]. They correspond with respect to their place of articulation (i.e. are homorganic) to the respective following consonant (alveolar, velar, bilabial).

Some rules are more likely to be applied than others. To a large extent, the degree to which rules apply (expressed in terms of Rule Application Probability; RAP) depends on factors such as the nature of the speech style (casual rather than formal) or speech rate (rapid rather than slow). Labov (1972:86) defines casual speech, in contrast to formal speech, as everyday speech used in informal situations in which no special attention is paid to expression. Generally, casual speech is produced at a faster tempo than formal spoken language. High-speech tempo generally induces higher RAPs (Wissing, D.; Van Dijkhorst, A. 2006). Other factors of importance for RAP are mentioned below. Consider the following examples regarding RAP, which varies on an index of 0.0 to 1.0: except in the case of extremely careful (slow) speech, identical consonants adjacent to each other are practically always realised as a single segment (thus RAP = 1.0), as explained further in Degemination. An example of the product of the Degemination Rule (sometimes called "amalgamation of identical consonants"), would be dis seker/dəs sekər/ pronounced as [dəsiəkər]. A rule like /d/-deletion, on the other hand, is not likely to be applied in careful speech in cases such as kinders/kəndərs/[kəndərs], but most probably will appear in casual speech, resulting in [kənərs]. This means that the RAP of /d/-deletion will lie somewhere between 0.0 and 1.0. (cf. d-deletion).

The occurrence of the pronunciation of the demonstative pronoun daardie/dardi/that one in formal style ([dardi]) versus casual speech ([dai]) illustrates the impact of speech style perfectly. Speech rate could very well be a decisive factor: the RAP for [dai] will most probably be even higher in casual speech used at a high speaking tempo.

[+] Data sets used in all topics on Phonological Processes

Several data sets, comprising sound files and associated phonetic transcriptions of a diverse kind, were available for inspection and analysis, namely a) recordings since 2001, over a time-span of more than six years, of news broadcasts read by a number of prominent radio presenters of RSG (Radio Sonder Grense, a nationwide Afrikaans radio station ), containing nearly ten hours of speech; and b) two sets of readings (SALAR = South African Language Resources, collected as part of a joint research project with the University of Ghent, Belgium; 2001 - 2003) of a diverse collection of prose by 129 Afrikaans-speaking persons of different ages, totalling about X hours of sound. For (b), each person had to read a passage of about 100 words twice: first at a normal tempo (RAN = Read Afrikaans Normal), and then at a fast tempo (RAF = Read Afrikaans Fast). The RSG recordings are taken as representative of Standard Afrikaans, read in a formal mode. Note, however, that the readers were all professionally skilled and trained to read in a relaxed way that could be considered approaching a casual speaking style, not very unlike what might be considered General Afrikaans (see a discussion of the concepts Standard Afrikaans, General Afrikaans, formal and casual speech here).

[+] Factors which enhance the application of phonological processes

The probability of application of phonological rules is also sensitive to a number of factors other than speech style and rate. Some of the most well-known factors are listed below (1 - 6 are broadly linguistic categories; the rest relate to sociolinguistic characteristics):

  1. Casual speech: Speech styles can be formal, semi-formal or informal. Formal speech typically is that found in radio and television news broadcasts, sermons, public speeches and the like. Usually, though not without exception, such speakers may be expected to be "standard" speakers of Afrikaans. The same persons are likely to speak in a less formal way - semi-formal of informal - in less formal situations; as such, their speech in these contexts is broadly characterisable as casual. Casual speech correlates closely with ease of articulation (Ernestus, M.T.C. 2000). Labov's definition of casual speech, paraphrased above, is adopted here.
    1. Standard Afrikaans: Standard Afrikaans is currently mainly used in public contexts. Most studies on Afrikaans phonology are devoted to Standard Afrikaans. Due to the availability of studies being primarily restricted to this variety, in the respective themes on phonological processes (see below) it will also be the main variety described. The description of General Afrikaans (see 1.2) will, however, build on this.
    2. General Afrikaans: We equate this variety with casual Afrikaans as described above. Casual variants of many languages other than English, Dutch and German are still completely unexplored (Ernestus, M.T.C. 2000). This includes Afrikaans and, thus, the descriptions presented here are based on personal observation, as well as on an electronic collection of Afrikaans read at a fast rate. This data set, SALAR, is comprised of 129 different text passages of, on average, 100 words each and read by 129 different Afrikaans-speaking persons of both genders, young and old.
  2. Grammatical category: function words often surface in highly reduced form. This may be ascribed also to the fact that such words have a very high frequency usage (see 6) and, consequently, speakers are familiar with such words (5). That is not to say, however, that words other than this type are not also susceptable to the effect of phonological processes, especially when some of the other factors mentioned below come into play.
  3. Syllable structure: In some respects phonological processes serve as a means of normalising complex syllabic patterns into more simplex ones, for example some consonant reduction rules simplify the less universal pattern -CC into the preferred -C (see Consonant cluster simplification). /d/-deletion, for example, greatly prefers a schwa in the following syllable, though in some cases short /ɑ/, as in Donderdag, also sometimes conditions for this effect. (See d-deletion).
  4. Stress placement: Stressed rounded non-back vowels are frequently derounded once stress is moved to another syllable. Note, though, that even in stressed position derounding of such Afrikaans vowels is quite common. (See Vowel derounding).
  5. Familiarity of lexical items: Unfamiliar words are normally less prone to variation than commonly used ones.
  6. Usage frequency: unfamiliar words typically have a lower frequency of usage, and are also less prone to variation than commonly used ones, as in 5. (Coetzee, A.W. & S. Kawahara 2013).
  7. Gender of speaker: Female speakers tend to differ from males as to a variety of processes (e.g. Voicing Assimilation, see Progressive voice assimilation, Regressive voice assimilation and Rounding of long /a/
  8. Age of speaker: Due to sound changes, younger speakers frequently differ from older ones e.g. in the case of /a/-rounding (Rounding of long /a/).
  9. Level of education of speaker: Highly educated speakers tend to speak Standard Afrikaans more readily than uneducated ones.
  10. Geographic origin of speaker: In some regions, typical accents are found; this is in an obvious way reflected in the specific pronunciation of some vowels.
  11. Ethnicity: Distinct differences are sometimes found in the sound systems of speakers of different races and ethnicities. The nasalisation of vowels, for example, is largely absent in Coloured Afrikaans while more readily present among speakers of Standard Afrikaans.

[+] Index of topics

Consonants
Vowels

References:
  • Ernestus, Mirjam T.C2000Voice Assimilation and Segment Reduction in Casual DutchUtrecht: LOTVrije Universiteit te AmsterdamThesis
  • Ernestus, Mirjam T.C2000Voice Assimilation and Segment Reduction in Casual DutchUtrecht: LOTVrije Universiteit te AmsterdamThesis
  • Ernestus, Mirjam T.C2000Voice Assimilation and Segment Reduction in Casual DutchUtrecht: LOTVrije Universiteit te AmsterdamThesis
  • Moortgat, Michael1981Subcategorization and the notion 'Lexical Head'Linguistics in the Netherlands 1981Amsterdam
  • Sabbagh, Joseph2014Right Node RaisingLanguage and Linguistic Compass8:124-35
  • Schuppler, B., Ernestus, M., Scharenborg, O. & Boves, L2011Acoustic reduction in conversational Dutch: A quantitative analysis based on automatically generated segmental transcriptionsJournal of Phonetics3996-109
  • Zonneveld, Wim1978A formal theory of exceptions in generative phonologyDordrechtForis
Suggestions for further reading ▼
phonology
  • Dutch
  • Frisian
  • Afrikaans
Show more ▼
morphology
  • Dutch
  • Frisian
  • Afrikaans
Show more ▼
syntax
  • Dutch
  • Frisian
  • Afrikaans
Show more ▼
cite
print
This is a beta version.